remository:storage
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
remository:storage [2022/09/22 08:35] – admin | remository:storage [2022/09/22 08:39] (current) – [Access Controls] admin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
The Amazon naming system, like the normal disk system, does not prevent name clashes. Just as with the file system, you can guarantee to avoid them by specifying "Real with ID" as described above. If that option is turned on, then each file will be placed in its own " | The Amazon naming system, like the normal disk system, does not prevent name clashes. Just as with the file system, you can guarantee to avoid them by specifying "Real with ID" as described above. If that option is turned on, then each file will be placed in its own " | ||
- | Using Amazon S3 gives you a lot of flexibility over storage (although you have to pay for it!). It also means that when a user downloads a file from your repository, it is sent to them directly from Amazon. That will normally be faster than sending from your web server. Again, there is a cost, but it is small unless you have a very large quantity of downloads. The use of Amazon clearly reduces the load on your web server, which may be a helpful move. | + | Using Amazon S3 gives you a lot of flexibility over storage (although you have to pay for it!). It also means that when a user downloads a file from your repository, it is sent to them directly from Amazon. That will normally be faster than sending from your web server. Again, there is a cost, but it is small unless you have a very large quantity of downloads. The use of Amazon clearly reduces the load on your web server, which may be a helpful move. Amazon claims that files stored in S3 have a very low probability of being lost. |
remository/storage.txt · Last modified: 2022/09/22 08:39 by admin